Is there any option better than a VPN for your requirements on all counts—the requirement of their data security?
As the world gets more cloud-centric, remote work becomes the norm, and networks are scattered across the globe, data transfer security is an issue that is never more brought into issue than now. So, a lot of organisations will find that much easier to decide on the VPN—the automatically encrypted data, the hidden IP addresses, and the secure access from almost anywhere. However, they fail to acknowledge the fact that, by their very use, a VPN does not give the best protection of all: it is by using the inherently unreliable infrastructure of the public internet.
A dedicated private network provides an intrinsically more secure and controlled environment, particularly for sensitive, large-scale, or mission-critical operations, even though Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are handy, flexible, and cost-effective in many situations. This article examines and compares VPNs and dedicated private networks with regard to their security, control, and best scenarios of usage in order to find the best choice for your business.
A VPN makes a secure, encrypted 'tunnel' through the public internet, which protects data during transit from hackers, eavesdroppers, and even ISPs. The VPN server works as a proxy and hides your location while providing secure remote access to enterprise networks or project sites that have restricted access. This makes VPNs one of the most effective and time-honoured methods for securing sensitive information, particularly when data is transmitted over unsecured public Wi-Fi or compromised networks, making it difficult to read even if intercepted by machines.
Such strong points come with one inherent limitation: the tunnel is still in coexistence with the shared, quite unreliable infrastructure of the public internet. Although encryption makes data unrecognisable for unauthorised interference, it cannot keep out interruptions from busy routes, spikes in latency, or large-scale attacks on the internet infrastructure. Furthermore, at exit points, the message exits the VPN server and is transmitted as encrypted data during its journey to the final destination, which increases the likelihood of the message being exposed. In simple terms, while VPNs provide significant overlay security, they are still greatly limited by vulnerabilities in the underlying network.
A private network, either using multiprotocol label switching or a completely dedicated fibre, ensures secure communication differently. Instead of encrypting data for delivery over the public internet, a private network restricts it to a completely isolated physical or logical path that never interacts with any public infrastructure. This isolation can be achieved via dedicated circuits or segmented virtual routes on shared hardware, ensuring that only authorised users or devices can access the network.
By definition, a private network avoids the public internet completely, so all of its data is never mixed with other traffic, and it ultimately protects itself from all of the common dangers like eavesdropping, man-in-the-middle assaults, and even denial of service attacks that leave small footprints. Because the traffic will stay inside a controlled environment, things are fine-tuned according to organisational regulations without the unpredictability that comes with shared backbone capacity, for instance, by restricting access, putting up firewalls, and encrypting data. Simply put, a private network not only secures data while it is in transit but also effectively removes it from the threat landscape of the internet, thus providing a far superior and deeper level of security for sensitive, regulated, or mission-critical
A VPN protects information traveling over the internet in transit; however, the packets still traverse public network nodes and, as such, are vulnerable to various attacks, such as DDoS attacks that disrupt availability, man-in-the-middle eavesdropping attempts, and routeing exploits targeting such protocols as BGP. Public channels, regardless of strong encryption, are still subject to congestion and other types of interference that may degrade the performance or reliability of the channels.
This type of availability management can avoid each and every one of these threats by completely denying any connection whatsoever to the public Internet. Data will always travel under predetermined routes that are secure without any chance of external scanning, hijacking attempts, or malicious traffic flooding. Security and integrity create a controlled environment with a more stable, secure, and disruption-resistant. A reliable connection is an important consideration for organisations that transmit sensitive financial data, medical records, intellectual property, or other mission-critical assets.
Design Your Ideal Network Today!
Get a future-proof network with our reliable and scalable data network design services.
In fact, a good quality VPN cannot control the activity on the public internet beneath it. Data packets are subject to unpredictable latency, jitter, and packet loss, which are characteristics of any network. While these factors may not significantly affect most regular workloads, they become critical for high-technology applications such as real-time trading, telemedicine, or international database synchronisation.
Private networks, in comparison, provide companies with that granularity of control across the following:
This degree of control not only improves performance and reliability but also guarantees predictable and safe communication—even in downtime or delay, which would result in severe operational and reputation-impairing losses.
In some cases, the private network is the only logical choice, where security, compliance, and performance have become the non-negotiable factors.
In each of these case studies, however, the VPN would still traverse the Internet's public routing at some stage, exposing the process to unnecessary risk, which demands full anonymity, reliability, and predictable performance. It is the private networks with their dedicated paths and controlled environmental conditions that provide the level of confidence required by these high-risk use cases.
However, although private networks offer secured performance and control in the end, they are not ideal for every user or location, especially with the new normal of hybrid or remote work. In this scenario, adopting a hybrid approach makes sense.
This way, private networks can be the backbone of important data centres, branches, and even partner connections, while VPNs can easily serve as access paths to secure environments remotely. In this model:
Integrating VPN access within a more extensive architecture of private networks allows organisations to equilibrate availability, performance, and security, such that they can take advantage of both technologies' layered defences appropriate to the context and challenges of current distributed operations.
That's more than theoretical with regard to mission-critical operations or large transfers of enterprise data or compliance-heavy sectors; it distinguishes tolerable risk from real operational assurance. The best methods typically use a combination of both: private networks as a secure, high-speed backbone for core systems, and VPNs as a bridge of flexibility and encryption for remote access. VPNs give remote access protection over the public Internet, but they aren't impervious to its vulnerabilities. Private networks, on the other hand, eliminate such vulnerabilities through dedicated controlled paths for sensitive or mission-critical operations.
The best security options use both private networks for important systems and VPNs for easier remote access, following rules, staying strong, and ensuring smooth operations.
If security, control, and performance are paramount for your organisation, get in touch with the Anticlockwise Team today. We will create a tailored solution combining VPNs' flexibility and private networks' fortress-like protection to keep your most valued data safe, accessible, and uncompromised.
Managing Director